CougarCorner

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-09-02T16:46:57-06:00

If Jesus is late too the party, that is. [/color]

Have we seen enough virgin lamps go out yet?

I'm going to go out on a limb and say Jesus is more than 8 years away.

Statistics: Posted by CougarClaw — Sun Sep 02, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-09-02T16:45:20-06:00

After last night, I have now watched Portman, Pawlenty, Rice, and Ryan all speak at the RNC. I have to say that based on that limited sample set, I think Romney made the right choice. Rice was an abject disappointment to me in her delivery--though her remarks were substantively moving, her delivery obfuscated what she was saying and it lost all power.

As a side note--Rick Santorum came into this convention thinking he would take the mantle as the runner-up to be first in line for a 2016 nomination, and he gave the most douchebaglike self-involved speech I have heard since the 2008 DNC. His eyes closed in passion trying to force a 5 minute hands metaphor was painful. Paul Ryan absolutely ripped that mantle from Santorum's hands last night by putting verbosity aside and addressing issues and fixes. I think Ryan is the face of the future of the GOP. I'm sorry I knocked him so much early on.

I actually thought of Sno during the RNC and about what you said regading Ryan. I paid especial attention to the speeches of Portman, Jindal, Rice, and Rubio as examples of what might have been. Ryan came out ahead of all of them and I arrived at the same conclusion you did for all of them except perhaps Marco Rubio (and Christie) . Rubio is clearly too Junior, and his Mormon past doesn't help him in a Romney ticket but that kid "gets it", I would definitely get behind Rubio's vision as well as Christie's. But I agree that Ryan and his pretty blue eyes are the future of the party. Rubio and Christie are waiting in the wings and will have bright futures as well but not before Ryan's done.

(Ryan/ Rubio in 2020?)

After the speech it was crystal clear that Ryan is the rising face of the GOP.

Statistics: Posted by CougarClaw — Sun Sep 02, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-08-30T17:16:45-06:00

After last night, I have now watched Portman, Pawlenty, Rice, and Ryan all speak at the RNC.

I think Ryan is the face of the future of the GOP. I'm sorry I knocked him so much early on.

See - you "nearly" knocked Paul Ryan off his game with all those "negative vibes."

I hope you learned your lesson. So, from now on and for ever more - only say things that are nice, and filled with sugar and spice.

Statistics: Posted by Ddawg — Thu Aug 30, 2012 5:16 pm

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-08-30T13:24:18-06:00

Rice was an abject disappointment to me in her delivery--though her remarks were substantively moving, her delivery obfuscated what she was saying and it lost all power.

Very obfuscated.

Also, Christie and Rubio will be big-time players come 2020. If Jesus is late too the party, that is.

Statistics: Posted by Mars — Thu Aug 30, 2012 1:24 pm

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-08-30T09:23:17-06:00

Ryan's speech was simply phenomenal last night.

Statistics: Posted by SpiffCoug — Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:23 am

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-08-30T08:34:39-06:00

After last night, I have now watched Portman, Pawlenty, Rice, and Ryan all speak at the RNC. I have to say that based on that limited sample set, I think Romney made the right choice. Rice was an abject disappointment to me in her delivery--though her remarks were substantively moving, her delivery obfuscated what she was saying and it lost all power.

As a side note--Rick Santorum came into this convention thinking he would take the mantle as the runner-up to be first in line for a 2016 nomination, and he gave the most douchebaglike self-involved speech I have heard since the 2008 DNC. His eyes closed in passion trying to force a 5 minute hands metaphor was painful. Paul Ryan absolutely ripped that mantle from Santorum's hands last night by putting verbosity aside and addressing issues and fixes. I think Ryan is the face of the future of the GOP. I'm sorry I knocked him so much early on.

Statistics: Posted by snoscythe — Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:34 am

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-08-17T23:19:20-06:00

Ryan was pretty much a GOP vote in the House until they lost the House in the 2006 mid-term elections when he had, essentially, a change of heart. I need to find the article that talked about, but Ryan was at home hunting after the election and decided what he wanted to do in Congress. He decided that he wanted to change and begin to take on the biggest issue facing the country - the deficit.

He got the Speaker of the House to appoint him, during the lame-duck session, the senior GOPer on the budget committee. He was able to convince the Speaker to do this above 13 more senior Representatives. Ryan wanted to be in a position that if the GOP ever retook the House, he as the then committee chairman could control the types of budgets that made it to the House floor.

Ryan made some bad votes - votes that cost other Republicans their seats (like Sen. Bob Bennett). TARP, the auto bailouts and Medicare Part D. These were huge government expenditures that should not have been made.

Ryan hopefully, like Mitt, will govern like he is campaigning.

Hope and Change. Beautiful ideas, right?

Paul like Mitt does not impress me. I have absolutely no faith in them and their changing ways. Unfortunately, out of default they get my vote. I'd love to see them prove it on the field. We'll see I suppose. First they have to beat Obama which is still a huge task for them.

Here's what I EXPECT to see. Mitt and Paul say all the right things (although, Mitt's had his moments of honesty when he will reveal he still is not a fiscal conservative), they win the election. Suddenly, they "realize" what kind of baggage that Obama left them and they will be pushing to continue bailouts, entitlements, and loans to giant corporations in order to "save" this country. Again, we'll see. This election is suddenly very boring to me.

Statistics: Posted by BroncoBot — Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:19 pm

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-08-17T15:51:25-06:00

Ryan was pretty much a GOP vote in the House until they lost the House in the 2006 mid-term elections when he had, essentially, a change of heart. I need to find the article that talked about, but Ryan was at home hunting after the election and decided what he wanted to do in Congress. He decided that he wanted to change and begin to take on the biggest issue facing the country - the deficit.

He got the Speaker of the House to appoint him, during the lame-duck session, the senior GOPer on the budget committee. He was able to convince the Speaker to do this above 13 more senior Representatives. Ryan wanted to be in a position that if the GOP ever retook the House, he as the then committee chairman could control the types of budgets that made it to the House floor.

Ryan made some bad votes - votes that cost other Republicans their seats (like Sen. Bob Bennett). TARP, the auto bailouts and Medicare Part D. These were huge government expenditures that should not have been made.

Ryan hopefully, like Mitt, will govern like he is campaigning.

Statistics: Posted by SpiffCoug — Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:51 pm

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-08-17T14:23:57-06:00

Sno, you may very well be right. If I am wrong and you are right I will gladly acknowledge your superiority. Let me say too that I am not necessarily speaking about what I think is best but from the perspective of an analyst looking for the best team to beat Obama.

I am not sure that Christie was ever really on the table and the rest we may never know what might have been. Personally I like Rice mostly because I like to watch her run intellectual circles around liberals.

I like what I see so far in the match-up of Romney/Ryan v. Obama/Biden. I really think Obama/Biden is going to go too far for the independence and many democrats. I think Romney/Ryan is going to connect more and more.

I do have a question for you. You said that the Ryan move was pandering to conservatives but at the same time you seem to suggest that Ryan is not conservative enough. Is that right?

Hmmm? Pandering to conservatives? I am still trying to let that soak in. That is a whole new animal for me.

Heck I don't understand how anyone that is not a conservative and yet takes an oath to uphold the constitution doesn't get charged with perjury.

Statistics: Posted by tww — Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:23 pm

Re: Paul Ryan

2012-08-16T19:27:56-06:00

I don't think that Obama's attempts at twisting this are going to have staying power like they normally would. He is just too far off from the truth and the backlash is greater than he expected. The more the topic comes up the better it makes Romney and Ryan look and the worse Obama looks. Heck, even my mother gets it and she is on a strict diet of liberal media. Obama is not Bill "slick willy" Clinton.

As the incumbent, all Obama has to do is prevent the alternative from sticking and steer the conversation to petty things rather than on the economy. He's been pretty damn successful at that. He hasn't even touched Stericycle yet, which is looking to be a planned October surprise.

Trying to tag Ryan as a DC insider is a stretch. Just because he has served in DC does not make him an insider especially when he has clearly stood against the DC establishment. Independents like Ryan because he is much easier to trust.

I take it you haven't looked at Ryan's pre-Obama voting record yet? Because it's not pretty for someone who talks a limited-government/shrink-the-deficit-line. He didn't just vote for TARP, he stood on the floor and implored other Republicans to do the same: "Madame Speaker, this bill offends my principles. But I’m going to vote for this bill in order to preserve my principles." That doesn't look like someone who "clearly stood against the DC establishment." He didn't start doing that until he had an incumbent to try and unseat. He's been a consummate insider in DC. All you have to do is look at what he did under Bush and look at his stock trading records in conjunction with the closed-door hearings he sat on. The last two years of gamesmanship against Obama doesn't suddenly make Ryan anti-establishment. It just makes him anti-Obama.

Ryan is a better choice than most of the other options because the others, like say Rubio or Rice, would have looked contrived to pander to racial segments of the vote. Ryan helps cement the focus on the economy which is where it needs to be. Ryan has much more depth and ability to persuade than does Palin.

I already said Rubio was DOA. I think Rice has enough respect to get past the idea of a pandering choice. Your argument ignores Pawlenty, Portman, Jindal or Christie who each would have been, in my view, equivalent selections--Portman and Pawlenty would have been markedly better.

We will see a much more broad cross-section of actual voters connecting with Romney-Ryan. This is a serious leadership team to fix America not a pandering trick and that is what most voters will see.

I think it was a pandering trick--pandering to the GOP base and trying to use the Ryan budget as a quick distraction from the tax return/Bain debate Romney has been unable to shrug off. I think Ryan has the skills for the ticket, but I think his history in the beltway outweighs the positives he brings to the ticket.

Statistics: Posted by snoscythe — Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:27 pm