No. The cost to school a football player at BYU, scholie and COA, is far less than at USC, given the tuition difference. And this difference certainly his not even in the top 5 reasons why BYU can't get an invite to a P5 conference.
This is absolutely an act of desperation. BYU is losing ground in recruiting. It just is. BYU has to do anything within its power to even the playing field for recruiting Elite athletes. TH is throwing everything and the kitchen sink at building the perception that BYU tis. Ready for prime time.
Honor code: strike 1.
Non P5 Conference: strike 2
Poor NFL draft record: strike 3
But hey, for a consolation prize, BYU can offer a whopping one thousand more dollars per year. I don't like the extra money out Of my pocket as a fan and little d-donor, but I get that TH has to do whatever he can to get some win-back with all of the disadvantages. And all at the risk of breaching if not leading out (top 10) into grey ethical territory of pay for play for amateur athletes.
My understanding is that the number is based on full cost of attendance (COA) numbers reported for federal aid and loan purposes - tuition + fees + books + living expenses (which can include room and board and also allowances for transportation, supplies, loan fees, dependent care, personal computer, study-abroad, etc.). This is a number reported so that the average student (ie, non-athlete) can receive federal financial aid to cover their education.
https://fafsa.ed.gov/help/costatt.htm" extra" allowances.
Because private schools like USC, Stanford, and Boston College already have such high tuition expenses, they intentionally lower the cost of living expenses and allowances estimates so that the total COA number for the average student (ie, non-athlete) appears more competitive. So, they are at a distinct disadvantage in the "player stipend" arena, because the schools' reported COA number is understated to be more competitive with other education institutions.
It will be very interesting to see how this plays out.
There will definitely be some athletes that shop schools based on the COA payout. How many is yet to be determined.
There will likely be some universities that re-evaluate their reported COA numbers, but I doubt that there will be much movement from the universities, because the Presidents and school administrators will have to balance benefits to the athletics programs with the detriment to marketing the costs to attend to the average student.Statistics: Posted by YNot — Wed May 06, 2015 3:50 pm
]]>