CougarCorner This is the Place, for Cougar Fans! 2016-07-28T11:05:43-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/app.php/feed/topic/19850 2016-07-28T11:05:43-06:00 2016-07-28T11:05:43-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227372#p227372 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]>
I don't like that we're creating the perception of essentially grovelling at the feet of the Big XII when we're far and away the best candidate for expansion -- it makes us look desperate and weak.
I think, unfortunately, that's the reality.
This may be the last time there is an opening to a Power 5 conference. If the Big 12 goes to 14, then only the Pac 12 doesn't have 14 teams, and so our last hope would be the liberal schools of the Pac 12 letting us in. And we have seen that once you are in, you are in forever. No one is talking about kicking weak schools out. If there is a time to grovel I think this is it.

And I think BYU is in this for the exposure and not the money. It would not surprise me if BYU offered to take hardly any money at all until the next media contract. If it is the last seat at the table, what wouldn't you do except give up no-Sunday play?

Statistics: Posted by Isola — Thu Jul 28, 2016 11:05 am


]]>
2016-07-27T15:39:20-06:00 2016-07-27T15:39:20-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227355#p227355 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]>
check out this article from SB Nation
http://www.sbnation.com/college-footbal ... ule-big-12

Key quotes: "The biggest conference tournaments in men’s basketball usually end on Selection Sunday, right before the NCAA Tournament field gets set. But the Big 12’s tournament typically ends on the Saturday of that weekend. That still means no Sunday final and virtually no change required for BYU to fit in."

"Some sports do require special circumstances, but BYU’s proved willing to take on most of the inconvenience itself."

Statistics: Posted by HoosierCougar — Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:39 pm


]]>
2016-07-27T12:06:20-06:00 2016-07-27T12:06:20-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227347#p227347 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]> Statistics: Posted by scott715 — Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:06 pm


]]>
2016-07-27T11:44:20-06:00 2016-07-27T11:44:20-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227345#p227345 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]>
I don't like that we're creating the perception of essentially grovelling at the feet of the Big XII when we're far and away the best candidate for expansion -- it makes us look desperate and weak.
I think, unfortunately, that's the reality.

If BYU gets in, which I think the chances are not great, it will be football only. The sunday play issue will doom the other sports, the conference is not going to be willing to change things just for BYU.

Will be interesting to see how this all shakes out.

Statistics: Posted by hypercoug — Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:44 am


]]>
2016-07-25T22:59:53-06:00 2016-07-25T22:59:53-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227320#p227320 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]>
Yeah, I don't like this.
We can't risk not getting our foot in the door. Saying that we're agreeable to do football only might actually give us a better chance at getting in with all sports, in the short and long term.
Why would Holmoe state this publicly instead of simply bringing it up with the conference? I don't like that we're creating the perception of essentially grovelling at the feet of the Big XII when we're far and away the best candidate for expansion -- it makes us look desperate and weak.
I think it makes us look flexible and easy to work with.
Again, why does it matter if the general public think this or not? As long as Holmoe makes this known to the Big XII brass, they know, and they're the only ones that matter.
I thought that Tom came off looking a little insecure. That's just me.

But the wisdom I see in publicly stating our flexibility is beating others to the punch. By others I mean schools (fans) who will use a public forum to disparage BYU.
Ding ding ding! Holmoe effectively addressed the questions already on people's minds. Time to sit and stew, and wait for then see about an invite. Not much to do now other than to keep stating the case why BYU is the #1 for expansion.

Statistics: Posted by TulaneVandyRiceCoug — Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:59 pm


]]>
2016-07-25T20:43:25-06:00 2016-07-25T20:43:25-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227317#p227317 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]>
Yeah, I don't like this.
We can't risk not getting our foot in the door. Saying that we're agreeable to do football only might actually give us a better chance at getting in with all sports, in the short and long term.
Why would Holmoe state this publicly instead of simply bringing it up with the conference? I don't like that we're creating the perception of essentially grovelling at the feet of the Big XII when we're far and away the best candidate for expansion -- it makes us look desperate and weak.
I think it makes us look flexible and easy to work with.
Again, why does it matter if the general public think this or not? As long as Holmoe makes this known to the Big XII brass, they know, and they're the only ones that matter.
I thought that Tom came off looking a little insecure. That's just me.

But the wisdom I see in publicly stating our flexibility is beating others to the punch. By others I mean schools (fans) who will use a public forum to disparage BYU.

Statistics: Posted by Ygridiron4ever — Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:43 pm


]]>
2016-07-25T16:49:13-06:00 2016-07-25T16:49:13-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227307#p227307 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]>
It's all about football not the WCC.
It's all about BYU sports and hurting what appears to be a good relationship with the WCC is a bad idea if we don't get an invite.

Statistics: Posted by frdbtr — Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:49 pm


]]>
2016-07-25T12:40:56-06:00 2016-07-25T12:40:56-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227301#p227301 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]> Statistics: Posted by scott715 — Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:40 pm


]]>
2016-07-25T10:36:31-06:00 2016-07-25T10:36:31-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227294#p227294 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]>
Yeah, I don't like this.
We can't risk not getting our foot in the door. Saying that we're agreeable to do football only might actually give us a better chance at getting in with all sports, in the short and long term.
Why would Holmoe state this publicly instead of simply bringing it up with the conference? I don't like that we're creating the perception of essentially grovelling at the feet of the Big XII when we're far and away the best candidate for expansion -- it makes us look desperate and weak.
I think it makes us look flexible and easy to work with.
Again, why does it matter if the general public think this or not? As long as Holmoe makes this known to the Big XII brass, they know, and they're the only ones that matter.
Stating things publicly can put pressure on the people listening because it removes the ability for them to come out and say "we didn't select so and so because they were not flexible". I don't see this as a desperation move, but a negotiation tactic. I think it is a good move. I still feel like BYU will be a long shot to get invited. I bought the expansion BS last time hook line and sinker and this time I am going to sit back and just watch what happens.

Edit: also it allows us to keep a good relationship with the WCC because it gives the impression that we are not desperately trying to get out of their conference.

Statistics: Posted by frdbtr — Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:36 am


]]>
2016-07-25T09:36:35-06:00 2016-07-25T09:36:35-06:00 https://www.cougarcorner.com/viewtopic.php?p=227292#p227292 <![CDATA[Re: Homoe tells ESPN BYU is open to Football only inclusion.]]>
Yeah, I don't like this.
We can't risk not getting our foot in the door. Saying that we're agreeable to do football only might actually give us a better chance at getting in with all sports, in the short and long term.
Why would Holmoe state this publicly instead of simply bringing it up with the conference? I don't like that we're creating the perception of essentially grovelling at the feet of the Big XII when we're far and away the best candidate for expansion -- it makes us look desperate and weak.
I think it makes us look flexible and easy to work with.
Again, why does it matter if the general public think this or not? As long as Holmoe makes this known to the Big XII brass, they know, and they're the only ones that matter.

Statistics: Posted by Schmoe — Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:36 am


]]>