Which Position Groups is of the LEAST Concern?
-
SpiffCoug
- TV Analyst
- Posts: 13335
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:11 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
Which Position Groups is of the LEAST Concern?
Which Position Groups is of the LEAST Concern?
I went with the WR/TE. Even though the TE position as a whole has been MIA the last half decade in Provo, I think we have some highly talented WRs that can make up for the dearth at TE.
I went with the WR/TE. Even though the TE position as a whole has been MIA the last half decade in Provo, I think we have some highly talented WRs that can make up for the dearth at TE.
BYU PER W/L Since 1972: 432-76 (.850)
(8.4xYDS)+(330xTD)+(100xCOM)-(200xINT)
..................ATT
SpiffCoug's posts are BB-8 approved!
(8.4xYDS)+(330xTD)+(100xCOM)-(200xINT)
..................ATT
SpiffCoug's posts are BB-8 approved!
-
stuckinbig10country
- Heisman Winner
- Posts: 2149
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:27 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Which Position Groups is of the LEAST Concern?
For me it was either WR or QB. I picked WR simply because of the unproven backup QBs. But even then, Taysom makes me not worry very much.
-
snoscythe
- Retired
- Posts: 8811
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:52 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Which Position Groups is of the LEAST Concern?
Not worried much about Williams/Brown/Hine/Carter in the backfield. They're at least proven, while most of the WR's have yet to live up to the hype and the "Bash Brothers" TEs have yet to play a collegiate snap at that position.
CougarCorner Prediction Game
Twitter Feed
Sponsored by Awkward Pepper
Calendar
Sponsored Links