Quinn's Laws

Feel free to discuss appropriate non-BYU/Sports related topics here. We ask you to respect other users, the Church, avoid soapbox postings, and keep it clean.
User avatar
Schmoe
Retired
Posts: 7613
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:50 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Quinn's Laws

Post by Schmoe »

BroncoBot wrote:
imuakahuku wrote:
BoiseBYU wrote:I'm really glad I'm not a liberal! ;)
I don't think we have any true libs on CC. Libertarian maybe but not liberal

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Tell me, how libertarian and liberal are different?
Libertarians and liberals are basically on opposite ends of the spectrum. Libertarians believe in the smallest amount of government possible, while modern liberals believe that the government should control and be in charge of as much as possible (see: Marxism, Socialism, Communism. see also: socioeconomic philosophies cooked up by men without any true life experience or high IQs that have failed every time they've been tried).

There are, however, a few places where liberals and libertarians intersect, like legalization of Marijuana.


I'm just a regular, everyday normal guy,
I can't afford a car, I use public transportation,
I don't mind, I read till I reach my destination,
sometimes a newspaper, sometimes a book,
the money I save, this stuff is off the hook,
User avatar
HoosierCougar
Junior
Posts: 724
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:17 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Quinn's Laws

Post by HoosierCougar »

I no longer see the political world as a spectrum or continuum. To me it's more like the Olympic rings: chunks of overlap between two or more ideologies.

Liberals and libertarians would allow for drug use. Liberals would regulate and tax it heavily, while libertarians would (generally) not.

Liberals and conservatives want limited government, believing markets solve problems if people are left to their own self interest. Except that conservatives want more gov't regulation in areas where the see markets for what they consider morally repugnant.

This is a very light discussion, I'm still working on my dissertation ;)


Post Reply