Odd Scenario of the Day

BYU Cougars Football. Still Open, now Independent.
Post Reply
User avatar
Mars
Retired
Posts: 9666
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:13 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Odd Scenario of the Day

Post by Mars »


Since it's the off-season... ;)


The Big Ten could expand to 14, the PAC-10 could expand to 12, and the Big XII could grow back to full, and no non-BCS team could be taken.

Possibility:
~The Big Ten finally expands, taking Notre Dame (about time!), Rutgers, and Syracuse, jumping from 11 schools to 14 (Pitt and Nebraska just miss the cut).
~The PAC-10 jumps on broken-hearted Missouri with a quick offer, which is enough to finally convince Colorado to come along as well (give my regards to bridesmaids BYU and Utah).
~The Big XII replaces the two departing North division teams with Louisville and Cincinnati (sorry TCU and Memphis).

That leaves Pitt, UConn, West Virginia, and South Florida without BCS status, shrinking the number of BCS conferences by 1 and the number of total BCS teams by 4. In fact, the 7 Big east basketball-only teams may evict them entirely, leaving them without a conference at all. The new non-football Big east could raid the Atlantic 10, and the BE refugees could form a new conference (the Big North) by raiding C-USA and taking Army/Navy, bringing to end the era of the independent. The MWC steals Boise State and maybe one or two more WAC teams, C-USA robs the Sunbelt and the WAC, and the surviving WAC absorbs the remaining Sunbelt. The ACC (though tempted) and the SEC remain pat, and somehow the MAC remains unscathed.


Mars Cauthon, Prince of the Cougars!
Resident board douchebag.
https://twitter.com/#!/eldermars
User avatar
tmoney35
Senior
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:25 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Odd Scenario of the Day

Post by tmoney35 »

Mars wrote:
~The Big Ten finally expands, taking Notre Dame (about time!), Rutgers, and Syracuse, jumping from 11 schools to 14 (Pitt and Nebraska just miss the cut).

That leaves Pitt, UConn, West Virginia, and South Florida without BCS status
Pitt and West Virginia are way better than Rutgers and Syracuse. I don't know much about type of schools the Big 10 wants are what type of schools Pitt and WV are, but just from a football aspect, Pitt and WV would be better.


User avatar
kiwibacon
All-American
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:18 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Odd Scenario of the Day

Post by kiwibacon »

tmoney35 wrote:
Mars wrote:
~The Big Ten finally expands, taking Notre Dame (about time!), Rutgers, and Syracuse, jumping from 11 schools to 14 (Pitt and Nebraska just miss the cut).

That leaves Pitt, UConn, West Virginia, and South Florida without BCS status
Pitt and West Virginia are way better than Rutgers and Syracuse. I don't know much about type of schools the Big 10 wants are what type of schools Pitt and WV are, but just from a football aspect, Pitt and WV would be better.
The Rutgers and Syracuse decision would be made due to $$$$. The TV market and potential revenue for the conference is greater with Rutgers and Syracuse vs. Pitt and WV.


User avatar
Mars
Retired
Posts: 9666
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:13 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Odd Scenario of the Day

Post by Mars »

kiwibacon wrote:
tmoney35 wrote: Pitt and West Virginia are way better than Rutgers and Syracuse. I don't know much about type of schools the Big 10 wants are what type of schools Pitt and WV are, but just from a football aspect, Pitt and WV would be better.
The Rutgers and Syracuse decision would be made due to $$$$. The TV market and potential revenue for the conference is greater with Rutgers and Syracuse vs. Pitt and WV.
WV's academics aren't up to the Big Ten's standard, nor their TV market, and Pitt's market is partially covered by Penn State already I believe.


Mars Cauthon, Prince of the Cougars!
Resident board douchebag.
https://twitter.com/#!/eldermars
Post Reply