As far as the bowl games go, I'll still attend our games against middle-of-the-road PAC-10 teams as long as the game is in Vegas, San Fran, or San Diego. Once you start putting it in Albuquerque or Fort Worth in December, that is a bit of a buzz-kill, and it's harder to rationalize putting out the coin for that. The raw part of the deal in my eyes is the "first choice" scenario they have lined up with the Vegas Bowl. Basically, that means no matter how well/bad BYU plays, if they are bowl eligible and the Vegas people think we will still fill the stadium (which we always will), we are going to be in Vegas. That SUCKS. Part of the mystique of bowl games is the "where are we going to end up" and the surprise revelation. For BYU fans, the mystique is gone as we instead play the "is this year the year Vegas changes things up?" game. As long as Vegas has that first choice, and as long as the PAC-10 keeps sending 5 teams to bowls, BYU is going to end up there 80% of the time that we are eligible. That means we are rarely going to get a nice at-large match-up like TCU got last year with BSU, and we are rarely going to play an intriguing team from an east coast conference. That is what sucks about the current bowl situation and the one-loss-and-you're-out set up of the BCS for non-AQs.Statistics: Posted by snoscythe — Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:32 am
]]>