CougarCorner

I get that it's a sin in our religion, but calling sexual relationships between monogamous hetero partners moral and gay partners immoral doesn't make much sense. Same as drinking--yes it's a sin in our religion but I wouldn't call non member drinkers immoral. [ Post made via Mobile Device ] http:/...

I get that it's a sin in our religion, but calling sexual relationships between monogamous hetero partners moral and gay partners immoral doesn't make much sense. Same as drinking--yes it's a sin in our religion but I wouldn't call non member drinkers immoral. [ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://...

I don't think that same sex attraction is a major and defining characteristic of a person unless they choose to act upon it. I, therefore, don't consider someone "gay" unless they are choosing to live the lifestyle,. What if they just hold hands, or kiss a little? Sounds like acting upon ...

I don't think that same sex attraction is a major and defining characteristic of a person unless they choose to act upon it. I, therefore, don't consider someone "gay" unless they are choosing to live the lifestyle,. What if they just hold hands, or kiss a little? Sounds like acting upon ...

Schmoe wrote:
I don't think that same sex attraction is a major and defining characteristic of a person unless they choose to act upon it. I, therefore, don't consider someone "gay" unless they are choosing to live the lifestyle,.

What if they just hold hands, or kiss a little?

By "gay", I did mean practicing homosexuality when reciting the scout oath. I do feel that homosexuals have a hard lot, and many of them have chosen to simply ignore those tendencies and live a Christ centered life. To those persons, I wholeheartedly support. AT THE SAME TIME, I don't wan...

He's also a genuinely great guy. My wife was his publicist for his last book.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Let me fill you in on a little secret Einstein - if a city, town, county, and a municipality are restricted by law to NOT infringe on the right to keep and bear arms - I assure you a private church (which has ZERO law making ability) cannot infringe on those Constitutional rights. For someone who l...

Oh, and the Church is private property and can deny entry to anyone it choses for any reason--like carrying a gun. Think about it--you have a clear constitutional right to make public statements contrary to church doctrine, but that doesn't mean the church can't deny you entry into the temple for d...

hawkwing wrote:How is 'inappropriate' a strict ban? It's also 'inappropriate' for women to wear pants to church, but nobody cares.

In the handbook, "inappropriate" is just church speak for prohibited. The handbook doesn't say it's inappropriate for women to wear pants--that's all you.