Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read it!
-
- BLUEshirt
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:27 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fan
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
I probably should have said I couldn't find a single "agency" (rather than "state") that required off duty cops to carry. So what? I may be "inexperienced" and "naive" but you are grasping at straws and my original statement still stands.Ddawg wrote:No - you are wrong. You post that you cannot find a single "state" that requires off-duty L.E. officers to carry concealed weapons off-duty.cornhole153 wrote:I can't find a single state that requires off duty officers to carry, so I concluded that only on-duty officers would be required to carry. You continue to claim that all off-duty officers are required to carry (to church), without producing a single cite? Yeah, I'm the one using hyperbole.ABYUFAN wrote:"Strict ban" =/= "prohibit"cornhole153 wrote:Okay--I had to go back and see my original to see all the hyperbole that's caused such an unnecessary ruckus. Here it is....ABYUFAN wrote:If you would have used this language in your origonal post, we'd have moved on 8 to 10 pages ago. You keep like this, avoiding hyperbole, and we'll get along just finecornhole153 wrote:So just answer me this--why does the church prohibit guns (except in rare circumstances) on their property (excluding possibly parking lots)?
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
"Interesting though that the church has a strict ban on guns (except for on duty officers that are required to carry) on their properties."
I guess I really should have added that bit about parking lots... So funny.
""off duty officers" =/= "rare circumstances"
Guess my original statement, after 8 pages of attacks, remains unblemished.
"Interesting though that the church has a strict ban on guns (except for on duty officers that are required to carry) on their properties."
This shows how inexperienced and naive you are. It's not the state that requires -it's the individuals police departments that have requirements for their officers to carry. It's called a police force multiplier. By having their off-duty officers carry, they multiply their presence in the community.
Here's the question - show a single state that bans off-duty L.E. officers from carrying concealed weapons. You can't - and they do.
I know you think you have all the answers - you don't. It's part of that liberal disease where you think your the smartest guy in the room. Your not.
All off duty cops can carry under fed law (GW signed). Again so what? It's Church policy that only cops that are REQUIRED to carry, can enter with a gun.
Last edited by cornhole153 on Sat Feb 02, 2013 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- BLUEshirt
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:27 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fan
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
"108k killed'? Are you saying that 108K attackers were killed in a single year?imuakahuku wrote:Your wish is my command. Not hard to find. Heard stats like this last week from another source too.cornhole153 wrote:FOUR accidentally shot (including a 2 year old and a 13 year old) in Baton Rouge last month alone.
http://theadvocate.com/news/police/5044 ... accidental" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Would be interesting to compare how often guns are used to kill attackers verses how often they are used in accidental deaths.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
A widely-known study conducted by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz in the 1990s found that there were somewhere between 830,000 and 2.45 million U.S. defensive gun uses annually. A National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS) which asked victims if they had used a gun in self-defense found that about 108,000 each year had done so. A big problem with the NCVS line of survey reasoning, however, is that it only includes those uses where a citizen kills a criminal, not when one is only wounded, is held by the intended victim until police arrive, or when brandishing a gun caused a criminal to flee.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2 ... rol-lobby/
Accidental gun deaths per year have been about 850 of which less than 200 are under 18 and that includes accidental police shootings, people mistaking family memebers for an intruder, hunting accident, and so on (this includes all guns not just hand guns).
A little eye opening aint it? 108k killed 803k-2.45million used to protect and in the vast majority of cases the gun is never fired. And there are some experts that think it might even be higher because of all the unreported uses to protect oneself. So do you think of those 2.45 million times, how many murders do you think were thwarted? How many rapes?
My recommendation to you is to go to a gun range and take a safety course and practice and see how it feels. If you don't feel any more responsible after the course and firing the gun then keep up the fight against guns. But I'm willing to bet that you will see what it feels like to posses such a deadly instrument and how vigilant you become while having it and then imagine how you would feel to point it at someone and how much you really really really don't want to ever have to fire it at another human being.
-
- All-American
- Posts: 1633
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:49 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
The NCVS said that not me. Take it up with them if you don't believe the numbers.cornhole153 wrote:"108k killed'? Are you saying that 108K attackers were killed in a single year?imuakahuku wrote:Your wish is my command. Not hard to find. Heard stats like this last week from another source too.cornhole153 wrote:FOUR accidentally shot (including a 2 year old and a 13 year old) in Baton Rouge last month alone.
http://theadvocate.com/news/police/5044 ... accidental" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Would be interesting to compare how often guns are used to kill attackers verses how often they are used in accidental deaths.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
A widely-known study conducted by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz in the 1990s found that there were somewhere between 830,000 and 2.45 million U.S. defensive gun uses annually. A National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS) which asked victims if they had used a gun in self-defense found that about 108,000 each year had done so. A big problem with the NCVS line of survey reasoning, however, is that it only includes those uses where a citizen kills a criminal, not when one is only wounded, is held by the intended victim until police arrive, or when brandishing a gun caused a criminal to flee.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2 ... rol-lobby/
Accidental gun deaths per year have been about 850 of which less than 200 are under 18 and that includes accidental police shootings, people mistaking family memebers for an intruder, hunting accident, and so on (this includes all guns not just hand guns).
A little eye opening aint it? 108k killed 803k-2.45million used to protect and in the vast majority of cases the gun is never fired. And there are some experts that think it might even be higher because of all the unreported uses to protect oneself. So do you think of those 2.45 million times, how many murders do you think were thwarted? How many rapes?
My recommendation to you is to go to a gun range and take a safety course and practice and see how it feels. If you don't feel any more responsible after the course and firing the gun then keep up the fight against guns. But I'm willing to bet that you will see what it feels like to posses such a deadly instrument and how vigilant you become while having it and then imagine how you would feel to point it at someone and how much you really really really don't want to ever have to fire it at another human being.
- scott715
- TV Analyst
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:56 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Location: Pendleton, OR
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-wi ... embers-day" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
500,000 new members.
500,000 new members.
-
- BLUEshirt
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:27 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fan
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
FBI says there are about 260 justifiable homicides a year. Weird. Not sure where the NCVS is getting the other 107,740...imuakahuku wrote:The NCVS said that not me. Take it up with them if you don't believe the numbers.cornhole153 wrote:"108k killed'? Are you saying that 108K attackers were killed in a single year?imuakahuku wrote:Your wish is my command. Not hard to find. Heard stats like this last week from another source too.cornhole153 wrote:FOUR accidentally shot (including a 2 year old and a 13 year old) in Baton Rouge last month alone.
http://theadvocate.com/news/police/5044 ... accidental" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Would be interesting to compare how often guns are used to kill attackers verses how often they are used in accidental deaths.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
A widely-known study conducted by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz in the 1990s found that there were somewhere between 830,000 and 2.45 million U.S. defensive gun uses annually. A National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS) which asked victims if they had used a gun in self-defense found that about 108,000 each year had done so. A big problem with the NCVS line of survey reasoning, however, is that it only includes those uses where a citizen kills a criminal, not when one is only wounded, is held by the intended victim until police arrive, or when brandishing a gun caused a criminal to flee.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2 ... rol-lobby/
Accidental gun deaths per year have been about 850 of which less than 200 are under 18 and that includes accidental police shootings, people mistaking family memebers for an intruder, hunting accident, and so on (this includes all guns not just hand guns).
A little eye opening aint it? 108k killed 803k-2.45million used to protect and in the vast majority of cases the gun is never fired. And there are some experts that think it might even be higher because of all the unreported uses to protect oneself. So do you think of those 2.45 million times, how many murders do you think were thwarted? How many rapes?
My recommendation to you is to go to a gun range and take a safety course and practice and see how it feels. If you don't feel any more responsible after the course and firing the gun then keep up the fight against guns. But I'm willing to bet that you will see what it feels like to posses such a deadly instrument and how vigilant you become while having it and then imagine how you would feel to point it at someone and how much you really really really don't want to ever have to fire it at another human being.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/cr ... a-table-15" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So, if the FBI is be believed, a gun owner is more than 3 times more likely to shoot and kill an innocent bystander than an attacker.
- Ddawg
- All Star
- Posts: 4637
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:24 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fan
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
Ok mr. cornhole -
Go ahead and give one documented incident where an off-duty L.E. officer was told he could not bring his concealed weapon into an LDS Church in Utah. Good luck. You won't find it.
Also, when police dept.'s require their off-duty officers to carry concealed weapons as a force multiplier - those are internal policies - you won't find those either. You're grasping at straws and trying to save face. I have no idea what point you're trying to make.
Go ahead and give one documented incident where an off-duty L.E. officer was told he could not bring his concealed weapon into an LDS Church in Utah. Good luck. You won't find it.
Also, when police dept.'s require their off-duty officers to carry concealed weapons as a force multiplier - those are internal policies - you won't find those either. You're grasping at straws and trying to save face. I have no idea what point you're trying to make.
- SpiffCoug
- TV Analyst
- Posts: 13335
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:11 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
Still waiting.SpiffCoug wrote:Cornhole, can I get an answer?SpiffCoug wrote:So, back to the original question, and one posed to corn hole: Should a gun control law include exemptions for law enforcement officials?
And I still haven't seen anything showing a Church-wide ban on weapons - just a public notification of one for church buildings in one in Utah.
BYU PER W/L Since 1972: 432-76 (.850)
(8.4xYDS)+(330xTD)+(100xCOM)-(200xINT)
..................ATT
SpiffCoug's posts are BB-8 approved!

(8.4xYDS)+(330xTD)+(100xCOM)-(200xINT)
..................ATT
SpiffCoug's posts are BB-8 approved!

-
- All-American
- Posts: 1633
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:49 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
A justifiable homicide is defined as a policeman killing a felon. It does not include private citizens killing in self defense. The 270 number is around average for police killings nationwide per year. I guess the devil is in the details.cornhole153 wrote:FBI says there are about 260 justifiable homicides a year. Weird. Not sure where the NCVS is getting the other 107,740...imuakahuku wrote:The NCVS said that not me. Take it up with them if you don't believe the numbers.cornhole153 wrote:"108k killed'? Are you saying that 108K attackers were killed in a single year?imuakahuku wrote:Your wish is my command. Not hard to find. Heard stats like this last week from another source too.cornhole153 wrote:FOUR accidentally shot (including a 2 year old and a 13 year old) in Baton Rouge last month alone.
http://theadvocate.com/news/police/5044 ... accidental" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Would be interesting to compare how often guns are used to kill attackers verses how often they are used in accidental deaths.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
A widely-known study conducted by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz in the 1990s found that there were somewhere between 830,000 and 2.45 million U.S. defensive gun uses annually. A National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS) which asked victims if they had used a gun in self-defense found that about 108,000 each year had done so. A big problem with the NCVS line of survey reasoning, however, is that it only includes those uses where a citizen kills a criminal, not when one is only wounded, is held by the intended victim until police arrive, or when brandishing a gun caused a criminal to flee.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2 ... rol-lobby/
Accidental gun deaths per year have been about 850 of which less than 200 are under 18 and that includes accidental police shootings, people mistaking family memebers for an intruder, hunting accident, and so on (this includes all guns not just hand guns).
A little eye opening aint it? 108k killed 803k-2.45million used to protect and in the vast majority of cases the gun is never fired. And there are some experts that think it might even be higher because of all the unreported uses to protect oneself. So do you think of those 2.45 million times, how many murders do you think were thwarted? How many rapes?
My recommendation to you is to go to a gun range and take a safety course and practice and see how it feels. If you don't feel any more responsible after the course and firing the gun then keep up the fight against guns. But I'm willing to bet that you will see what it feels like to posses such a deadly instrument and how vigilant you become while having it and then imagine how you would feel to point it at someone and how much you really really really don't want to ever have to fire it at another human being.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/cr ... a-table-15" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So, if the FBI is be believed, a gun owner is more than 3 times more likely to shoot and kill an innocent bystander than an attacker.
As for the 100k, I can see that number being much closer to the actual amount than 300. There are almost a million violent crimes reported each year involving hand guns alone.
-
- BLUEshirt
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:27 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fan
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
"Wont find those"? Huh? There are loads of police agency policy manuals on line, and I can't find a single one that requires off-duty carrying. For example, my local (Seattle) department specifically states that it's optional:Ddawg wrote:Ok mr. cornhole -
Go ahead and give one documented incident where an off-duty L.E. officer was told he could not bring his concealed weapon into an LDS Church in Utah. Good luck. You won't find it.
Also, when police dept.'s require their off-duty officers to carry concealed weapons as a force multiplier - those are internal policies - you won't find those either. You're grasping at straws and trying to save face. I have no idea what point you're trying to make.
"Off-duty sworn personnel may choose whether or not to be armed."
http://www.seattle.gov/police/publicati ... earms.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Again, here's the Church's official policy... "The carrying of lethal weapons, concealed or otherwise, within their walls is inappropriate except as required by officers of the law"
I don't know how any reasonable person could read these two policies and conclude, as you have, that all LE officers can carry into church?
-
- BLUEshirt
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:27 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fan
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Hurry and pass gun control before we have time to read i
That FBI table is titled "Justifiable Homicide by Weapon, Private Citizen"imuakahuku wrote:A justifiable homicide is defined as a policeman killing a felon. It does not include private citizens killing in self defense. The 270 number is around average for police killings nationwide per year. I guess the devil is in the details.cornhole153 wrote:FBI says there are about 260 justifiable homicides a year. Weird. Not sure where the NCVS is getting the other 107,740...imuakahuku wrote:The NCVS said that not me. Take it up with them if you don't believe the numbers.cornhole153 wrote:"108k killed'? Are you saying that 108K attackers were killed in a single year?imuakahuku wrote:Your wish is my command. Not hard to find. Heard stats like this last week from another source too.cornhole153 wrote:FOUR accidentally shot (including a 2 year old and a 13 year old) in Baton Rouge last month alone.
http://theadvocate.com/news/police/5044 ... accidental" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Would be interesting to compare how often guns are used to kill attackers verses how often they are used in accidental deaths.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
A widely-known study conducted by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz in the 1990s found that there were somewhere between 830,000 and 2.45 million U.S. defensive gun uses annually. A National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS) which asked victims if they had used a gun in self-defense found that about 108,000 each year had done so. A big problem with the NCVS line of survey reasoning, however, is that it only includes those uses where a citizen kills a criminal, not when one is only wounded, is held by the intended victim until police arrive, or when brandishing a gun caused a criminal to flee.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2 ... rol-lobby/
Accidental gun deaths per year have been about 850 of which less than 200 are under 18 and that includes accidental police shootings, people mistaking family memebers for an intruder, hunting accident, and so on (this includes all guns not just hand guns).
A little eye opening aint it? 108k killed 803k-2.45million used to protect and in the vast majority of cases the gun is never fired. And there are some experts that think it might even be higher because of all the unreported uses to protect oneself. So do you think of those 2.45 million times, how many murders do you think were thwarted? How many rapes?
My recommendation to you is to go to a gun range and take a safety course and practice and see how it feels. If you don't feel any more responsible after the course and firing the gun then keep up the fight against guns. But I'm willing to bet that you will see what it feels like to posses such a deadly instrument and how vigilant you become while having it and then imagine how you would feel to point it at someone and how much you really really really don't want to ever have to fire it at another human being.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/cr ... a-table-15" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So, if the FBI is be believed, a gun owner is more than 3 times more likely to shoot and kill an innocent bystander than an attacker.
As for the 100k, I can see that number being much closer to the actual amount than 300. There are almost a million violent crimes reported each year involving hand guns alone.