Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 8:40 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
- Prediction Group: Cougar Law
- Location: Dallas TX
- Contact:
Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
Sure, TCU beating BYU and then winning a BCS game would be good, but TCU losing wouldn't be that bad, either.
If TCU loses but wins out, and BYU wins out, then you have two MWC teams with one loss. Their only BCS competitor is BSU. Sure, BSU will likely be undefeated, but you will have TONS of national debate of whether a one-loss MWC team is more deserving of a BCS berth than an undefeated WAC team.
National pundits will note that MWC is a tougher conference, thereby making the MWC argument for us. They will comment on how difficult it is to make it through an MWC schedule as opposed to a WAC schedule. They will discredit BSU stats on one hand while boosting the credibility of MWC stats. No one will claim that the WAC competes with a BCS conference (lie the Big East), but there will be plenty of pundits insisting that the MWC is better than the Big Least, and possibly better than the ACC (kindly excusing BYU's indiscretion against FSU considering how awful FSU has turned out to be).
So, if I'm a UNLV fan (one of the 4), then sure, I'd rather TCU win out and see a case made that TCU is more deserving than BSU. But I would hear the same arguments, and perhaps more vehemently, if TCU loses.
If TCU loses but wins out, and BYU wins out, then you have two MWC teams with one loss. Their only BCS competitor is BSU. Sure, BSU will likely be undefeated, but you will have TONS of national debate of whether a one-loss MWC team is more deserving of a BCS berth than an undefeated WAC team.
National pundits will note that MWC is a tougher conference, thereby making the MWC argument for us. They will comment on how difficult it is to make it through an MWC schedule as opposed to a WAC schedule. They will discredit BSU stats on one hand while boosting the credibility of MWC stats. No one will claim that the WAC competes with a BCS conference (lie the Big East), but there will be plenty of pundits insisting that the MWC is better than the Big Least, and possibly better than the ACC (kindly excusing BYU's indiscretion against FSU considering how awful FSU has turned out to be).
So, if I'm a UNLV fan (one of the 4), then sure, I'd rather TCU win out and see a case made that TCU is more deserving than BSU. But I would hear the same arguments, and perhaps more vehemently, if TCU loses.
- nycougar
- Gray Shirt
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:59 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
I agree with this. The other (even better) scenario, of course, is that Boise State loses. Even though they have an easy schedule it's very hard to go undefeated. Even the best teams have off games. If they lose and BYU wins out, BYU is in, period. That's why it never makes sense to me when people say BYU's chances for the BCS are a long shot. All it takes is a Boise loss and us winning.
-
- BLUEshirt
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:37 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
I agree, McGregor.
However, it would be better for BYU if it wins out and plays a 1-loss Utah team at the end of the year. That way BYU will finish the season with a win against a top 15 team. Perception at the end of the year always carries more weight. We would be in the BCS top 12 and maybe top 10 after that. Depending on what the Rose Bowl does (they promised to take a non-AQ it they didn't get a Pac10-Big 10 matchup) there is a slim (1%) chance BYU and BSU get a bid...at least here's to believing in a pipe dream.
However, it would be better for BYU if it wins out and plays a 1-loss Utah team at the end of the year. That way BYU will finish the season with a win against a top 15 team. Perception at the end of the year always carries more weight. We would be in the BCS top 12 and maybe top 10 after that. Depending on what the Rose Bowl does (they promised to take a non-AQ it they didn't get a Pac10-Big 10 matchup) there is a slim (1%) chance BYU and BSU get a bid...at least here's to believing in a pipe dream.
- Mars
- Retired
- Posts: 9666
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:13 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
The MWC has never finished the regular season with two teams with one or less losses before.
- snoscythe
- Retired
- Posts: 8811
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:52 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
What about TCU and Utah last season?Mars wrote:
The MWC has never finished the regular season with two teams with one or less losses before.
- Mars
- Retired
- Posts: 9666
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:13 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
TCU had two losses, to Oklahoma and to Utah. I wasn't saying combined.snoscythe wrote: What about TCU and Utah last season?
The ideal is an undefeated team, a 1-loss team, and a 2-loss team. But that can't happen this year.
- snoscythe
- Retired
- Posts: 8811
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:52 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
No, my bad....I thought TCU only had the Utah loss last season. You're right, I'm wrong. You're attractive, I'm not that good-looking, etc.Mars wrote:TCU had two losses, to Oklahoma and to Utah. I wasn't saying combined.snoscythe wrote: What about TCU and Utah last season?
The ideal is an undefeated team, a 1-loss team, and a 2-loss team. But that can't happen this year.

- Mars
- Retired
- Posts: 9666
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:13 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
Anyone covered in blue paint is all good in my book.snoscythe wrote: No, my bad... I thought TCU only had the Utah loss last season. You're right, I'm wrong. You're attractive, I'm not that good-looking, etc.

-
- Over-Achiever
- Posts: 6772
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 1:02 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 57 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Why beating TCU COULD be good for the conference
I agree with your thinking but frankly I care a lot more about BYU then the stupid conference. If you are secretly hoping that TCU go undefeated and go to a BCS Bowl, then you are not a true BYU fan.mcgregor wrote:Sure, TCU beating BYU and then winning a BCS game would be good, but TCU losing wouldn't be that bad, either.
If TCU loses but wins out, and BYU wins out, then you have two MWC teams with one loss. Their only BCS competitor is BSU. Sure, BSU will likely be undefeated, but you will have TONS of national debate of whether a one-loss MWC team is more deserving of a BCS berth than an undefeated WAC team.
National pundits will note that MWC is a tougher conference, thereby making the MWC argument for us. They will comment on how difficult it is to make it through an MWC schedule as opposed to a WAC schedule. They will discredit BSU stats on one hand while boosting the credibility of MWC stats. No one will claim that the WAC competes with a BCS conference (lie the Big East), but there will be plenty of pundits insisting that the MWC is better than the Big Least, and possibly better than the ACC (kindly excusing BYU's indiscretion against FSU considering how awful FSU has turned out to be).
So, if I'm a UNLV fan (one of the 4), then sure, I'd rather TCU win out and see a case made that TCU is more deserving than BSU. But I would hear the same arguments, and perhaps more vehemently, if TCU loses.