Archived Topic

Supreme Court and Gay Marriage

by SpiffCoug · 3/27/2013

Sponsored Advertisementad content
B
BoiseBYU
jvquarterback wrote:
Should be noted that while the federal aspects of DOMA are down, the provision providing that states and territories have the right to deny recognition of other States' same-sex marriages was not at issue and not affected by today's Windsor decision, so the FFC battle will still need to be fought. It wasn't before the Court in Windsor as the plaintiff was married to her partner in Canada---not a State or territory (although some might argue that ;) ).



There is a lot of States's Rights language in Windsor, so it is too hard to read the tea leaves at this point on that surviving aspect of DOMA.


Kennedy basically said it's going down with the next case that brings that issue up.


I'm not so sure. He would not have put that much state's rights stuff in there otherwise. All Windsor says if a state allows same sex marriage, Congress can't treat differently, yes? I'm always the naive optimist, but Kennedy left open the prospect that a state that does not allows same sex marriage will not be forced to accept such constructs.....
I
imuakahuku
DarthMagnus wrote:
Aren't those in favor of gay marriage actually condoning sin? Aren't they actually asking for approval of their conduct?



In the LDS Church you are ONLY allowed to have sexual relations with your husband or wife to whom you are LEGALLY and LAWFULLY wedded.



You can't just go in your backyard with your girlfriend, exchange some vows you each wrote and then go upstairs and get it on.



By allowing gay marriage you are saying that sexual relations between two members of the same sex is proper and not wrong.



Homosexual conduct is wrong, immoral and sinful. Those who support gay marriage are holding apostate views. There is no other way to describe it.

So, the church holds that masturbation is wrong. Should I, as a practicing Mormon, feel the need to support government intervention in that issue as well? What about porn? Alcohol? More than one earring? Taking the lords name in vane? Worshiping idols? Worshiping false gods? Businesses that are open on Sunday?



We seem to "allow" plenty of stuff that we disagree to exist in our society without personally condoning or agreeing with it. You seem to imply quite heavily that it is a mormon's duty to attempt to legislate the entire religion onto the rest of society.




You miss the whole point of Gay Marriage.

1st. Wickedness never was happiness. It is contrary to natural and eternal law and thus people who ingage in this will never find true hapiness. They are trying to get society to ease this burden but no amount of legislation will ever do so.

2nd. They attack marriage because it has always been religious in nature. Civil Unions just wouldn't do even though they gave gays everything they are demanding. They will sue and try to force every religion to "respect" their new rights through litigation and intimidation. But again this will never ease them of this burden. Sin cannot be rationalized away. It must be repented from. I heard a "Gay" leader on a radio show and the host very alertly and in tune with this asked point blank will you leave the pastors alone that won't marry gay couples? The person would not answer. Because they will not leave them alone. They will hunt down every last religious leader calling homosexual acts a sin. What I would like to see is these lefties go to one of their other lefty groups and demand inclusion. Maybe say the Muslim's.
D
Ddawg
imuakahuku wrote:

You miss the whole point of Gay Marriage.

1st. Wickedness never was happiness. It is contrary to natural and eternal law and thus people who ingage in this will never find true hapiness. They are trying to get society to ease this burden but no amount of legislation will ever do so.

2nd. They attack marriage because it has always been religious in nature. Civil Unions just wouldn't do even though they gave gays everything they are demanding. They will sue and try to force every religion to "respect" their new rights through litigation and intimidation. But again this will never ease them of this burden. Sin cannot be rationalized away. It must be repented from. I heard a "Gay" leader on a radio show and the host very alertly and in tune with this asked point blank will you leave the pastors alone that won't marry gay couples? The person would not answer. Because they will not leave them alone. They will hunt down every last religious leader calling homosexual acts a sin. What I would like to see is these lefties go to one of their other lefty groups and demand inclusion. Maybe say the Muslim's.


This post is spot on. The recent DOMA ruling, and Prop.8 by the SCOTUS is not the end of the road. It actually a springboard. It invigorates and energizes the militant gay supporters to go after traditional, conservative, religious leaders, and their institutions.



I have seen it for years. These folks do not respect opposing points of view. They do not respect opposing values, or deeply held principles. These folks are aggressive, relentless, militant, well funded, and energized. They will not be satisfied till they are swept away long held traditional values and attached criminal penalties.



Case in point - a Christian baker in Denver, CO is in real trouble because he did not to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple. Whatever happened to "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone." It's not true.



http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/07/gay-colorado-couple-sues-bakery-for-allegedly-refusing-them-wedding-cake/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



This baker was hauled into court by the ACLU and the Colorado Attorney General. He faces the possibility of jail.



It's a brave new world.
M
Mars
hawkwing wrote:
I think this conference pretty much answered the question of whether faithful members could support changing laws to allow gay marriage and be in concert with the Lord, if there was any question before.

Which talk in specific are you referring to? Because I have family members that don't believe gay marriage is wrong (for non-LDS folk).
S
SpiffCoug
Emphasis added

Elder David A. Bednar, of the Quorum of the 12 Apostles.

http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2013/04/we-believe-in-being-chaste?lang=eng" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a single, undeviating standard of sexual morality: intimate relations are proper only between a man and a woman in the marriage relationship prescribed in God’s plan. Such relations are not merely a curiosity to be explored, an appetite to be satisfied, or a type of recreation or entertainment to be pursued selfishly. They are not a conquest to be achieved or simply an act to be performed. Rather, they are in mortality one of the ultimate expressions of our divine nature and potential and a way of strengthening emotional and spiritual bonds between husband and wife. We are agents blessed with moral agency and are defined by our divine heritage as children of God—and not by sexual behaviors, contemporary attitudes, or secular philosophies.


Elder Boyd K. Packer, of the Quorum of the 12 Apostles.

http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2013/04/these-things-i-know?lang=eng" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
We live in a very dangerous world that threatens those things that are most spiritual. The family, the fundamental organization in time and eternity, is under attack from forces seen and unseen. The adversary is about. His objective is to cause injury. If he can weaken and destroy the family, he will have succeeded.



Latter-day Saints recognize the transcendent importance of the family and strive to live in such a way that the adversary cannot steal into our homes. We find safety and security for ourselves and our children in honoring the covenants we have made and living up to the ordinary acts of obedience required of the followers of Christ.


Alma taught that “the Lord cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance.” In order to understand this, we must separate the sin from the sinner.



For example, when they brought before the Savior a woman taken in adultery, obviously guilty, He dismissed the case with five words: “Go, and sin no more.” That is the spirit of His ministry.



Tolerance is a virtue, but like all virtues, when exaggerated, it transforms itself into a vice. We need to be careful of the “tolerance trap” so that we are not swallowed up in it. The permissiveness afforded by the weakening of the laws of the land to tolerate legalized acts of immorality does not reduce the serious spiritual consequence that is the result of the violation of God’s law of chastity.
Sponsored Advertisementad content
H
HoosierCougar
SpiffCoug wrote:
Emphasis added

Elder David A. Bednar, of the Quorum of the 12 Apostles.

http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2013/04/we-believe-in-being-chaste?lang=eng" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a single, undeviating standard of sexual morality: intimate relations are proper only between a man and a woman in the marriage relationship prescribed in God’s plan. Such relations are not merely a curiosity to be explored, an appetite to be satisfied, or a type of recreation or entertainment to be pursued selfishly. They are not a conquest to be achieved or simply an act to be performed. Rather, they are in mortality one of the ultimate expressions of our divine nature and potential and a way of strengthening emotional and spiritual bonds between husband and wife. We are agents blessed with moral agency and are defined by our divine heritage as children of God—and not by sexual behaviors, contemporary attitudes, or secular philosophies.


Elder Boyd K. Packer, of the Quorum of the 12 Apostles.

http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2013/04/these-things-i-know?lang=eng" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
We live in a very dangerous world that threatens those things that are most spiritual. The family, the fundamental organization in time and eternity, is under attack from forces seen and unseen. The adversary is about. His objective is to cause injury. If he can weaken and destroy the family, he will have succeeded.



Latter-day Saints recognize the transcendent importance of the family and strive to live in such a way that the adversary cannot steal into our homes. We find safety and security for ourselves and our children in honoring the covenants we have made and living up to the ordinary acts of obedience required of the followers of Christ.


Alma taught that “the Lord cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance.” In order to understand this, we must separate the sin from the sinner.



For example, when they brought before the Savior a woman taken in adultery, obviously guilty, He dismissed the case with five words: “Go, and sin no more.” That is the spirit of His ministry.



Tolerance is a virtue, but like all virtues, when exaggerated, it transforms itself into a vice. We need to be careful of the “tolerance trap” so that we are not swallowed up in it. The permissiveness afforded by the weakening of the laws of the land to tolerate legalized acts of immorality does not reduce the serious spiritual consequence that is the result of the violation of God’s law of chastity.


While I'm very libertarian on the political/legal issue of gay marriage, I am saddened that our country has come to the spiritual state we currently see. (In another post, we can discuss the impact of the "innocuous" inclusion of sympathetic gay and other immoral characters in popular media and the impact of this strategy in shaping the moral ideology of the under 30 citizenry.)



I agree with President Packer that "The family, the fundamental organization in time and eternity, is under attack from forces seen and unseen. The adversary is about. His objective is to cause injury. If he can weaken and destroy the family, he will have succeeded." But I struggle with the idea that a legally binding gay marriage weakens my marriage and family. Had I lived in Denmark or Canada or South Africa for the last 15 years, would my marriage have been weaker due to the laws there?



Marriage is a binding covenant between me, my wife, and God the Father. Regardless of the laws of any nation, mine is the responsibility to ensure the strength of my marriage and family. Likewise, had I lived in Denmark where drugs and prostitution are legal, I would still be responsible to ensure fidelity and adherence to the Word of Wisdom.



All that said, the family is under attack. Imagine a person who was raised by 2 loving gay parents, was taught to be responsible and tolerant. He encounters a pair of LDS Missionaries. They teach him the restored gospel. He gains a testimony. In a discussion of the Law of Chastity, he is told that his parents' relationship isn't valid in the sight of God. How likely is he to continue down the path of making covenants? The entire Kingdom is under attack.
M
Mars
"Regardless of the court decision, the Church remains irrevocably committed to strengthening traditional marriage between a man and a woman, which for thousands of years has proven to be the best environment for nurturing children."



http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/church-responds-supreme-court-marriage-rulings?CID=HPL2P05W01034" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;





*Personal Opinion:* I understand those who want to remain out of any gay marriage debate and simply focus on strengthening their own marriage and family. It's very important, but it's also easy to focus inward and ignore outward. Being a "soldier" for Christ is much more difficult, even uncomfortable. But it must be done, and the less others do the more difficult the work is for those willing to be uncomfortable for their God. *IMO*
T
tww
I believe the so-called gay marriage debate has nothing to do with marriage but in reality is the final destruction of all God-given rights by focusing on freedom of religion.



"The laws of nature and nature's God" are superior to all man made laws. That is why the founders made the successful argument that government cannot give or take rights that God has already granted.



The institution of marriage was created and granted by God, not man or government. When this nation was founded the Supreme Court was to remain inferior and subordinate to God's law. If Congress "can make no law" regarding religion then the courts have nothing on which to rule for no power was ever granted them to do anything else.



Yes, I know that congress has overstepped their bounds and made laws, not only regarding religion but actually denying the rights of religion and the courts proceed to rule on that which they were never granted jurisdiction.



My point is that atheists were never able to fully destroy rights but it looks like "gay marriage" will because it will brand God and religion as anti-rights and convince many that the government must step in and regulate rights thus making them no longer God-given.



Of course then God will not allow Himself to be mocked and well... I think things will not be pretty for those that have not defended Him and His law. That is why I do not believe there is any room for compromise when it comes to rights and covenants issued by God.
T
tww
Another thought



We know how violent and demanding the people of Sodom were to Lot. We know what God did to Sodom and Gomorrah. We also know that eventually God called Jerusalem "Sodom and Gomorrah" and we know what happened to Jerusalem shortly thereafter.



We also know that the same rules apply to America that applied to Jerusalem. It is not hard to guess what will happen to America.



Have a nice day! :)
G
Guest
The fact of the matter is that prophets and apostles have stated in conference multiple times that opening the door to gay and other alternative forms of marriage does weaken the sanctity of marriage. This isn't just one quote taken from a prophet or apostle taken out of context, but a topic repeated clearly and often. The time is quickly coming where all Latter Day Saints will have to actually choose to follow The Lord and his Prophet or be left behind.



But how many times did Noah preach about the coming flood and yet good people back then probably thought, 'I don't have to worry about trying to stand up to the ever spreading wickedness. My family is good. The ark is a bit melodramatic on Noah's part, don't you think?'
Sponsored Advertisementad content
S
SpiffCoug
empahsis added

Spencer W. Kimball, President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Lattery-day Saints:

October Conference 1980

http://www.lds.org/general-conference/1980/10/families-can-be-eternal?lang=eng" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Furthermore, many of the social restraints which in the past have helped to reinforce and to shore up the family are dissolving and disappearing. The time will come when only those who believe deeply and actively in the family will be able to preserve their families in the midst of the gathering evil around us.



Whether from inadvertence, ignorance, or other causes, the efforts governments often make (ostensibly to help the family) sometimes only hurt the family more. There are those who would define the family in such a nontraditional way that they would define it out of existence. The more governments try in vain to take the place of the family, the less effective governments will be in performing the traditional and basic roles for which governments are formed in the first place.



Whether we like it or not, so many of the difficulties which beset the family today stem from the breaking of the seventh commandment (see Ex. 20:14). Total chastity before marriage and total fidelity after are still the standard from which there can be no deviation without sin, misery, and unhappiness. The breaking of the seventh commandment usually means the breaking of one or more homes.


We of all people, brothers and sisters, should not be taken in by the specious arguments that the family unit is somehow tied to a particular phase of development a mortal society is going through. We are free to resist those moves which downplay the significance of the family and which play up the significance of selfish individualism. We know the family to be eternal. We know that when things go wrong in the family, things go wrong in every other institution in society.



Those who, whether in ignorance or malice, attack the family are setting in motion an awful and needless cycle of misery and despair, for they will search in vain and pain for substitutes, and the wisdom of the worldly wise shall perish publicly for their folly concerning the family.



The decline in many of our families is occurring at a time when the nations of the world are moving into some of the most difficult times known.



Permissiveness will not pull us through such crises. Materialism will not sustain us, for moth and rust will still lay waste and corrupt all mortal treasures.



Our political institutions—parliaments, congresses, and assemblies—cannot rescue us if our basic institution, the family, is not intact. Peace treaties cannot save us when there is hostility instead of love in the home. Unemployment programs cannot rescue us when many are no longer taught how to work or do not have the opportunity to work or the inclination, in some cases, to do so. Law enforcement cannot safeguard us if too many people are unwilling to discipline themselves or be disciplined.

Mark E. Peterson

April Conference 1980

http://www.lds.org/general-conference/1980/04/where-do-we-stand?lang=eng" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But how many of us realize how serious this conflict is? Do we measure its effect upon our own family circles? Do we understand what the devil is trying to do to us? Do we recognize his evil emissaries for what they are when they openly assail us or when they seek deceitfully to seduce us quietly?



Seduction is his greatest weapon. Do we realize that? I repeat: seduction is the greatest weapon of the devil. It is alluring; it falsely appears to be advantageous and desirable. He would have us think that bitter is sweet, that black is white, that sin is acceptable, that virtue is obsolete, archaic, and prudish.



Because he revels in filth, he would tell us that to be clean is some naive concept of our grandmother’s age which does not apply in this enlightened day. He says that evil is good and that standards have been relaxed. “Go your way,” he says; “fear no consequences; do your own thing; have fun; express your basest desires if you wish, and let yourselves go!” That is his philosophy.



Do we recognize it when it is flung at us by our angry foes or when it comes with a soft voice and a disarming smile? Do we truly recognize evil when we see it? Do we really know right from wrong? If we do not, then let us hasten to learn from our Church leaders. They will tell us quickly and plainly.



If we do know what is right, have we the courage to stand up for it, to defend virtue, to declare the validity of our faith, to oppose false teachings, and to fight the unpopular battle? Have we the moral stamina to confront any and all opportunities and thus preserve truth, uphold cleanliness, and defend the cause of God?



The time has come when we must take a far more firm and positive stand than ever before. We must identify illicit sex, pornography, filthy speech, and the use of liquor, tobacco, marijuana, and worse drugs as enemies of God and enemies to ourselves.
S
scott715
I can't help but reflect on the book of Mormon where when the people turned away from the Lord and then their laws got corrupted and then destruction came.
N
nuk13
Hey these are 33 years old! The world has changed so how valid can these sayings be? But wait, the Savior's teachings are now over 2000 years old. There is an erie resemblance in what these men are saying and what He said so long ago. Not only that but Jehovah (some even say He is the same as the Messiah) gave to Moses and many other prophets these same principles and commandments. These sayings predate even the grandmothers Elder Peterson references! Then again, maybe not, grandmothers go back to our greatgrandmother Eve.



Scott and Spiff, I thank you for your additions yesterday and this morning.
S
SpiffCoug
And out of wedlock child rate has sky rocketed as well.



And we're surprised that today's generation has a warped sense of what is and isn't a marriage and family?
Sponsored Advertisementad content
B
BoiseBYU
The quotes are amazing. Once again prophets warned us and warn us far in advance. If only we would heed them! Same sex marriage is not THE attack on the family, in my humble view, but one of the attacks. Marriage and family have been under attack with the rise of hedonism, pride, selfishness, pride, and immorality. Much of the attack is succeeding because individually and collectively, we (socieity) have elevated the gaining of pleasure and comfort over children and sacrifice. Once society migrated the purpose of marriage and family from the raising up of children to the use, where wanted, of allowing two adults to obtain and pursue pleasure, we were on the road to destruction. It is demoralizing to behold
S
snoscythe
BoiseBYU wrote:
It is demoralizing to behold


I see what you did there.
B
BoiseBYU
snoscythe wrote:
It is demoralizing to behold


I see what you did there.


not even a freudian slip!
S
snoscythe
scott715 wrote:
http://patdollard.com/2013/07/it-begins-pedophiles-call-for-same-rights-as-homosexuals/



And so it begins.....


Under the keen legal reasoning of the majority in U.S. v. Windsor, all a plaintiff challenging marriage laws needs to argue is that "no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure." I think pedophilia is a hard case, but polygamy should be a slam-dunk, which will be awkward for all those in the church who have been so vocal about being glad it's gone. Not saying it's going to come back if/when it's legal, but the possibility is enough to make people nervous.
Page 3 of 4
This is an archived topic from the original CougarCorner forum. New replies are not accepted.