Syria = WMD = War

I Agree on your last statement Cougarfan. I would love to explore more of your theories on WWII at some point.

I think anytime we look at using U.S. military power, we must ask a few questions.



1. What are our vital strategic interests in attacking Syria?

2. What do we plan on accomplishing?

3. Do we have a particular ally that we are trying to assist?

4. What is our end game with this attack?

5. If Obama does decide to unilaterally attack without Congressional authorization, will it violate the War Powers Resolution of 1973?



Personally, I do not believe there is any national strategic interest in attacking Syria.

Double. Sorry.

Some one suggested this somewhere. How come a year after the murders in Benghazi our government has done nothing much outside of talking as little about it as they can get away with. On the other hand no Americans have been harmed in Syria and all of a sudden the administration seems on fire to start a war.



It is amusing that kerry let the statement about Syria emptying their pockets out accidentally and now that everybody is jumping on it they're taking credit for it.