B
byufan4everredneckjedi wrote:
The problem here is that a team that may be worthy of the champions league when they win their conference may not be the next year when they are actually in it. For example, compare Utah 2004 to Utah 2005. They went from top 10 to .500.
Thus, teams like BYU, Oklahoma, Texas, USC, etc. that are consistently good and win their conference will be rewarded and be able to stay in the Champions League every year. Teams like the Utah that can't put together a good team two years in a row will be one and done in the Champions League and will embarress themselves.