CIA told help to Stand Down in Benghazi

http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/26/cowardice-father-of-murdered-navy-seal-reacts-to-news-calls-for-help-were-denied-three-times/?utm_source=Daily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2012-10-26_174211&utm_content=4835385&utm_term=_174211_174218" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later on the annex itself was denied by the CIA chain of command -- who also told the CIA operators twice to "stand down" rather than help



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/cia-operators-were-denied-request-for-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources-say/#ixzz2ARoJ2IX2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And the CIA (Gen. Patraeus) is saying that the order to stand down did NOT come from the CIA.



This is HUGE. The White House essentially did nothing while Americans were being killed. Other than watch them die, that is.

SpiffCoug wrote:
And the CIA (Gen. Patraeus) is saying that the order to stand down did NOT come from the CIA.



This is HUGE. The White House essentially did nothing while Americans were being killed. Other than watch them die, that is.

+1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1. +1.



I am so angry over these reports. This is seismic. A real watershed. No joke here.

:bug: :bug: :bug: :bug: :bug: :bug: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :evil:

Bin Laden is dead. So are Christopher Stephens, Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith and Glen Doherty.

I haven't checked today but I don't think pmsnbc has said much if anything about this. I don't know if any of the others have. Gee, it was all a misunderstanding and obama is such a great guy and a heqq of a debater, why do they need to report anything more. If I knew how to do an opinion poll I'd like to put one on here comparing this to Watergate. It is far worse. There were no deaths, or rapes in Watergate. Come to think of it, that is fact and not an opinion.

I told my wife on 9/12 that this was going to be huge. That it could be Watergate huge. And that it could swing the election if the facts come out before 11/6. It was just a gut feeling at the time.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ten-questions-white-house_657977.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Ten great questions that should be answered.

Great questions. Good post. Benghazi is serious business and it is not going away.



The Obama apologists down-play Benghazi and try to brush all questions away - saying "it's just political." Baloney. This is serious command failure to protect our people - followed by a concerted cover-up.

Now there are reports that the commanding general of AFRICOM (the guy in charge of all military personnel an decisions on the continent) ignored the directives to not send in operatives. He was going to send them in anyways. These reports are saying that he was immediately relieved of command and the order to stand down was reaffirmed.



Scary stuff if true.

Will this come out in the campaigns?

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ten-questions-white-house_657977.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Ten questions for the white house

SpiffCoug wrote:
Now there are reports that the commanding general of AFRICOM (the guy in charge of all military personnel an decisions on the continent) ignored the directives to not send in operatives. He was going to send them in anyways. These reports are saying that he was immediately relieved of command and the order to stand down was reaffirmed.



Scary stuff if true.

I hadn't heard that. do you have a link to something?

SpiffCoug wrote:
Now there are reports that the commanding general of AFRICOM (the guy in charge of all military personnel an decisions on the continent) ignored the directives to not send in operatives. He was going to send them in anyways. These reports are saying that he was immediately relieved of command and the order to stand down was reaffirmed.



Scary stuff if true.

This would also explain why the SEAL was painting the enemy gun to be hit with a missile. The AFRICOM commander must have had his finger on the button when he was relieved of command.



Which then means that the SEAL was totally exposed and left all alone to die.

http://www.redstate.com/jamesmpratt/2012/10/27/breaking-africom-general-carter-ham-relieved-of-command-minutes-before-ordering-benghazi-rescue/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

tww wrote:

Now there are reports that the commanding general of AFRICOM (the guy in charge of all military personnel an decisions on the continent) ignored the directives to not send in operatives. He was going to send them in anyways. These reports are saying that he was immediately relieved of command and the order to stand down was reaffirmed.



Scary stuff if true.

This would also explain why the SEAL was painting the enemy gun to be hit with a missile. The AFRICOM commander must have had his finger on the button when he was relieved of command.



Which then means that the SEAL was totally exposed and left all alone to die.

Worse yet as it has been explained to me and now I have heard it on a couple talk shows, that to "paint" a target you need to have it synched with a specific missle which must be in the area. The WH claims the drones were unarmed so that would me that the Specter's were already circling (which some reports say there were at least two in Libya already). If so they really hung these guys out to dry and this was hours after they saved civilians and others from the Bengazi post and brought them back to the CIA Annex. And if the Annex had been breach what of all those that were there? Reports say up to 30 were rescued from the other building. Obama is one messed up dude and needs his walking papers.

I still think it will be a landslide as Americans stand up to socialism. I will laugh when Romney wins Penn, MI, WI, and IA along with OH. He might even get NJ, NH, and who knows an outside chance at NY (Bloomburg is endorsing Romney).

Obama is still leading in most swing states.



Supposing those polls are accurate and he wins. Does Obama get impeached over this?

imuakahuku wrote:

SpiffCoug wrote:
Now there are reports that the commanding general of AFRICOM (the guy in charge of all military personnel an decisions on the continent) ignored the directives to not send in operatives. He was going to send them in anyways. These reports are saying that he was immediately relieved of command and the order to stand down was reaffirmed.



Scary stuff if true.

This would also explain why the SEAL was painting the enemy gun to be hit with a missile. The AFRICOM commander must have had his finger on the button when he was relieved of command.



Which then means that the SEAL was totally exposed and left all alone to die.

Worse yet as it has been explained to me and now I have heard it on a couple talk shows, that to "paint" a target you need to have it synched with a specific missle which must be in the area. The WH claims the drones were unarmed so that would me that the Specter's were already circling (which some reports say there were at least two in Libya already). If so they really hung these guys out to dry and this was hours after they saved civilians and others from the Bengazi post and brought them back to the CIA Annex. And if the Annex had been breach what of all those that were there? Reports say up to 30 were rescued from the other building. Obama is one messed up dude and needs his walking papers.

I still think it will be a landslide as Americans stand up to socialism. I will laugh when Romney wins Penn, MI, WI, and IA along with OH. He might even get NJ, NH, and who knows an outside chance at NY (Bloomburg is endorsing Romney).

It seems to me that the more time that goes by the more incriminating this is against Obama. Not only do more facts come out that reveal the mishandling and cover-up but when American representatives are attacked on American property there needs to be a clear and violent response. In other words, something needs to be and should have been blown to hell by now. To not respond sends the message that America is weak and killing Americans is fully acceptable.



Those men that died could have been saved. Obama either watched them die or went to bed after ordering their deaths. He may as well have murdered them himself.



Obama no longer deserves any benefit of doubt about his outright hatred toward America. If he is re-elected he will sell us out in a heartbeat.

The differences in how a real president (Reagan) and a real loser (Obama) both handle an international crisis involving American lives.



http://www.humanevents.com/2012/10/28/68839/





A P.S. to this article.

One thing North does not mention regarding the excuse about needing permission from Libya (which is pathetic): In 1985 a Delta team landed in Italy immediately after the flight carrying the terrorists landed. The Italian military got to the plane first and surrounded it. The Delta force then surrounded the Italians. The American officer pointed his gun at the Italian officers head and ordered Him to stand down. The Delta team then took the terrorists into custody.



That's the way it is done.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;