frdbtr wrote:
This is just purely my opinion, but I think the easiest way for fans to voice that they are displeased by something a player or coach is doing is by booing. A boo can mean a lot of different things. I was at Bronco's first game and I booed. Why did I boo? I was trying to voice my opinion that I did not support the call Bronco made. Did that mean I didn't support Bronco? Heck no! I've always supported him. I was back the next game cheering for Bronco and the rest of the team. How else could I have had a part in voicing my opinion to Bronco about the call he made? He most definitely didn't like it, but it definitely woke him up and made him question his own call. We understand his reasoning for why he punted but I bet he agrees that it was a stupid decision. People don't have to take boos so personal. If I were making a ton of money for coaching I would go into understanding that I could get booed and if I did I probably deserved it by making a bone-headed decision. That's just my two cents.
Bronco's paycheck has nothing to do with him being humiliated by being booed in his first game. Humiliating our own players by booing them, no matter how you rationalize the act, is classless.
It is also COUNTER PRODUCTIVE! Why is it that "we," as fans, think that we have the right to boo and humiliate the
human players and coaches for their performance or decisions, when we are imperfect in our own performance and decisions, just because they are being paid, or receiving a schollie, or simply "on the team?" What message do we think we are giving them? A boo (other than at, say... a referee) is a very generic communication, that very rarely conveys you did "this specific thing" wrong. It usually means, and is ALWAYS heard as "I don't like you." When teams are booed by their own fans, who are supposed to be supporting them, the result is always humiliation, discouragement and loss of confidence, NOT motivation. Athletic performance depends, in great measure, on the performers' mental state and confidence. That is why we go to the games to cheer our team on. The more excited and happy they feel, the better they play. Why don't some of us get that? Haven't we noticed that, in our own games? I certainly have!
In the case in point, Bronco figured out why he was being booed, but still got the message that they ALWAYS get when booed. With 20-20 hind sight, he could see that perhaps, under the extreme pressure of being a brand new head coach in a very big game, he perhaps didn't make the best decision. What if it had worked like he envisioned it? Would it have still been a "bonehead" call? What if (as in the pro. game someone cited) he had made the opposite decision, and not made it, and the opponent scored. Would the same loyal fans have booed him for that? What message, about the call, did he get from the "armchair coach" fans, that he couldn't have figured out all by himself, without being humiliated in front of literally millions of stadium, TV and radio observers, from both teams' fan bases and national observers?
I have been new on a number of jobs in my lifetime. If I had been humiliated, as Bronco was, on my first day, believe me, I would remember it well. Knowing how that felt, and how it would be felt even more deeply by young men in my charge, I would take every opportunity to tell people how wrong it is to treat your own in that manner. Booing your own team is VERY POOR SPORTSMANSHIP, no matter how you rationalize it. Booing one coach because you had been frustrated by another is unconscionable. Booing someone who is just learning his job, (first game....no one can be expected to just step in and do
everything right) is rediculuos. Most of all, nothing good comes of it, and a lot of bad comes of it. It is, and always will be counter productive.