M
MTMMars wrote:I wouldn't say that. There was plenty of PAC 10 talk for weeks.
Exactly. All of the Utah fans who can't manage to get excited about their own team can easily get very excited about USC and UCLA.
Uh, huh :roll:
by SpiffCoug · 8/6/2010
Mars wrote:I wouldn't say that. There was plenty of PAC 10 talk for weeks.
Exactly. All of the Utah fans who can't manage to get excited about their own team can easily get very excited about USC and UCLA.
MTM wrote:MTM wrote:
I wouldn't say that. There was plenty of PAC 10 talk for weeks.
Exactly. All of the Utah fans who can't manage to get excited about their own team can easily get very excited about USC and UCLA.
Uh, huh :roll:
Schmoe wrote:Mars wrote:I wouldn't say that. There was plenty of PAC 10 talk for weeks.
Exactly. All of the Utah fans who can't manage to get excited about their own team can easily get very excited about USC and UCLA.
Uh, huh :roll:
The talk wasn't focused on Utah, it was focused on PAC-10 expansion, and there was actually more talk about how and why BYU didn't get an invite than about Utah, sorry.
MTM wrote:Exactly. All of the Utah fans who can't manage to get excited about their own team can easily get very excited about USC and UCLA.Uh, huh
Mars wrote:Mars wrote:Uh, huh
Exactly. All of the Utah fans who can't manage to get excited about their own team can easily get very excited about USC and UCLA.
The truth hurts that much eh? :lol:
Eastern wrote:
What Whittingham did would happen at any school across the country even if it isn't an arch-rival player watching. The fact that it was an arch-rival would give him more cause. Nothing classless about it.
Schmoe wrote:What Whittingham did would happen at any school across the country even if it isn't an arch-rival player watching. The fact that it was an arch-rival would give him more cause. Nothing classless about it.
Ummm, there are former players from both schools who are in the sports media now and several attend other teams' practices.
Eastern wrote:Eastern wrote:
What Whittingham did would happen at any school across the country even if it isn't an arch-rival player watching. The fact that it was an arch-rival would give him more cause. Nothing classless about it.
Ummm, there are former players from both schools who are in the sports media now and several attend other teams' practices.
Ummm, welcome to college football. Head coaches have the right to, and do, remove anyone from a practice if they feel they need to. I guarantee you that Ohio State would not allow ex-Michigan players to watch closed practices even if they are in "the media". Same for Texas-OU, Florida State-Florida, Auburn-Alabama. Same if it was any other team but much more so for hated rivals.
But leave it to BYU fans to play the victim card again over something that happens everywhere. :lol:
Eastern wrote:
I guarantee you that Ohio State would not allow ex-Michigan players to watch closed practices even if they are in "the media". Same for Texas-OU, Florida State-Florida, Auburn-Alabama. Same if it was any other team but much more so for hated rivals.
tmoney35 wrote:I guarantee you that Ohio State would not allow ex-Michigan players to watch closed practices even if they are in "the media". Same for Texas-OU, Florida State-Florida, Auburn-Alabama. Same if it was any other team but much more so for hated rivals.
guarantee? you must spend a lot of time scouring to internet to find stories of college football coaches kicking reporters out of their practices
Eastern wrote:
What Whittingham did would happen at any school across the country even if it isn't an arch-rival player watching. The fact that it was an arch-rival would give him more cause. Nothing classless about it.
CougarClaw wrote:
I think much more likely it shows that Whittingham thinks BYU's integrity is a sham and that we're all hypocrites. And that kind of disrespect for someone trying to do the right thing is odd and paranoid.
Eastern wrote:
What Whittingham did would happen at any school across the country even if it isn't an arch-rival player watching. The fact that it was an arch-rival would give him more cause. Nothing classless about it.
Y12 wrote:What Whittingham did would happen at any school across the country even if it isn't an arch-rival player watching. The fact that it was an arch-rival would give him more cause. Nothing classless about it.
Just like players from every other team in the country would say the same things about their rivals as Max Hall said.
Where was this perspective last November?