Bronco shirks responsibility again

I have always thought he should be the dc not hc. But it's not my choice....

Gucci33 wrote:
I have always thought he should be the dc not hc. But it's not my choice....

Based off of what exactly?

Gucci33 wrote:
I have always thought he should be the dc not hc. But it's not my choice....

Unless you are Lance Reynolds Sr, you have no rational basis in this opinion. Bronco's 1st 5 years have a higher winning percentage then evern Lavelle. He is in complete control of this program and will get this thing fixed, starting with the defense.

taekwondave wrote:

Wow! There is some serious misdirected ire on this thread.



Ps. Yes Dave, I have read the entire thread except for a couple of times I skimmed your longer posts because they seemed to be rehashing the same things. Just because some on here disagree with you does not mean they haven't read the entire thread.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">

The fact that they disagree with me does not lead me to believe they didn't read it, certain things they say that I already addressed indicate they didn't.

You know, Dave, just because you think that you've expressed yourself perfectly, doesn't mean that you have, and just because others disagree with you, doesn't mean that they haven't read what you posted and at least tried to understand it. If there's a miscommunication here, it's two sided, and if there's not, then it just makes it sound like you can't understand how anyone could disagree with you.

Schmoe wrote:

BYULV wrote:
Wow! There is some serious misdirected ire on this thread.



Ps. Yes Dave, I have read the entire thread except for a couple of times I skimmed your longer posts because they seemed to be rehashing the same things. Just because some on here disagree with you does not mean they haven't read the entire thread.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">

The fact that they disagree with me does not lead me to believe they didn't read it, certain things they say that I already addressed indicate they didn't.

You know, Dave, just because you think that you've expressed yourself perfectly, doesn't mean that you have, and just because others disagree with you, doesn't mean that they haven't read what you posted and at least tried to understand it. If there's a miscommunication here, it's two sided, and if there's not, then it just makes it sound like you can't understand how anyone could disagree with you.

Okay schmoe.