Isola wrote:
I can't believe the Honor Code Office jumped to conclusions before they had the real story from a reliable source.
That is almost like fans condemning the Honor Code Office based on rumors of their handling of a situation.
This definitely has merit. However, I'm not making assumptions. Carri Jenkins, the University spokeswoman said that BYU "became aware of the violation on Monday and that a review is under way," not that the investigation is concluded. (see quote below from Jay Drew's article in the SL Trib:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/cougars/51342026-88/davies-byu-team-code.html.csp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
BYU announced in a terse news release that Davies, a 6-foot-9 sophomore from Provo High, âwill not represent the university on the menâs basketball team throughout the remainder of the 2010-11 seasonâ because of a âviolation of the BYU Honor Code.â
School spokeswoman Carri Jenkins said Tuesday night that the school does not release details regarding violations of the code. She said the Honor Code Office of the university owned and operated by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints became aware of the violation on Monday and that a review is under way.
I have merely argued that it is unwise, in my opinion, to act so quickly when a review is ongoing, as was officially stated. The swiftness and severity of the action, with barely one day's knowledge of the violation, gives the impression to everyone in the world that the violation is serious. In ESPN's First Take, I believe it was Skip Bayless who said something to the effect that the swiftness of the action confirms that Davies wasn't swearing at the barista at Starbucks or drinking coffee.
(
http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/24584/video-first-take-debates-byus-honor-code" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
I think it is safe to say that most everyone believes that BYU is not a heavy-handed institution. I was not the poster who compared the Honor Code office to the Gestapo. I think the Honor Code is a very important part of the BYU experience, and I am grateful it is in place. Thanks to the honor code, more than one of us was assisted in making it safely to a temple marriage.
However, the problem I see with the process is, again in my opinion, that the University releases too much information by even identifying that an honor code violation has taken place. Obviously it is a tricky thing with high profile students like athletes, because the media come asking questions, which is not generally the case with the average student.
There are a finite number of honor code tenets and it is common sense that some of those are serious, suspendable offenses and others are not. By taking swift and definite action, the University actually identifies, without giving details, that the offender has committed one of less than a handful of possible infractions for which such a punishment would be appropriate. Especially when the university clarifies as Carri Jenkins did in the article cited above, in her official capacity, that the offense is not related to any other possible university or team rule violation:
"Asked if the dismissal had anything to do with Daviesâ academic standing, she said, âNo. This is a violation of the honor code.â
Jay Drew is now also tweeting that
"BYU has announced that sophomore Brandon Davies' honor code violation is not a criminal offense."
So, what is left on the list of suspendable offenses? Really, one, maybe two plausible options.
My opinion is simply that the declaration to the world should be that an "unspecified violation of team and/or university rules" has occurred and as a result the player will be suspended. Maybe that wouldn't make a difference in the speculation that occurs, but it would definitely open up the possibility of many more infractions so that the student doesn't get so easily convicted of a particular offense in the eyes of the public.
I felt the same way with how Harvey Unga's situation occurred. He handled the media very gracefully, and humbly owned what he did. However, I just don't think that BYU should be part of helping the media or public identify what transgressions an individual has committed, as long as no laws of the land have been broken. Transgressions should remain in confidence between the individual and his or her ecclesiastical leader(s).
Sorry that was long, but I wanted to clarify that I have no beef with the Honor Code or the Honor Code office, only with the communication from the university that makes it easier to identify a young adult's transgressions. I am just grateful that when I go to see my bishop, that the church isn't officially announcing that I have violated a tenet of my faith that I committed to live when I joined the church, and thereafter publishing a specific list of the things I haven't done. ;)